Browse thread
[Caml-list] GODI, second version
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gerd Stolpmann <info@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] GODI, second version |
Am Mit, 2003-08-06 um 03.05 schrieb Jacques Garrigue: > From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de> > > there is now an improved version of GODI for download: > > > > http://www.ocaml-programming.de/packages/godi-bootstrap-20030805.tar.gz > > > > - The bootstrap script tries to pre-configure labltk. It looks into > > much more locations that the O'Caml configure script. I think this > > was one of the biggest problems in the first release. > > OK. Nice attempt, and properly splitting the work with ocaml's > configuration script. > By the way, I'm not sure this is a good idea to make labltk an > optional package, for two reasons: > - since it gets configured with ocaml, you have to recompile ocaml if > something goes wrong (your pre-search may help, but since you don't > check by explicitly linking this may still be wrong). > - it includes ocamlbrowser, which is an ocaml tool expected to be > there > > If your motivation is to allow binary packages including only part of > the stuff, then it might be a better idea to make ocaml a metapackage, > and have packages ocaml-core, ocaml-graphics, ocaml-labltk, > ocaml-camlp4 as dependencies. I am more thinking of server installations without X windows, so the split is X/non-X. camlp4 is part of the main ocaml package, there is really no need to have it separate. Maybe a solution of the configuration problem is to run the configure script again for labltk, but only to use the labltk-specific results (i.e. tkdefs, tklibs). This is more user-friendly than the current solution, and there is no danger to configure the various parts in an incompatible way. Meta packages: nice idea, but the question is what the users want to have. Maybe they are more interested in "distribution sets" for tasks, i.e. a graphics set, a web set, a database set, ... Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners