Browse thread
[Caml-list] Polymorphic graph widget problem
-
Richard Jones
- Remi Vanicat
- Michal Moskal
- Issac Trotts
- Matt Gushee
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Polymorphic graph widget problem |
If you'll only be graphing ints and floats, why not just use floats and
cast to them? To support both, you could try this:
type number = Int of int | Float of float
class chart :
...
number array -> (* the data being plotted *)
object
method repaint : Gdk.Rectangle.t option -> unit
end
It might also help to think of the array as a map from ints to floats.
Then you could write this instead:
class chart :
...
(int * int * (int -> float)) -> (* x0, x1, the data being plotted *)
object
method repaint : Gdk.Rectangle.t option -> unit
end
- ijt
Richard Jones wrote:
>As part of a project I'm doing at the moment, I've written a Gtk graph
>widget using lablgtk. The graph currently plots ints, so the type
>looks something like this:
>
>class chart :
> ?width:int ->
> ?height:int ->
> ?packing:(GObj.widget -> unit) ->
> ?show:bool ->
> int array -> (* the data being plotted *)
> object
> method repaint : Gdk.Rectangle.t option -> unit
> end
>
>All fine, but now I'd like to generalise this so it can plot floating
>point values as well as int, thus:
>
>class ['a] chart :
> ?width:int ->
> ?height:int ->
> ?packing:(GObj.widget -> unit) ->
> ?show:bool ->
> 'a array -> (* the data being plotted *)
> object
> method repaint : Gdk.Rectangle.t option -> unit
> end
>
>The problem with this is that at various places in the implementation
>we need to break the polymorphism. eg. To plot Y labels we call
>'string_of_int', and to work out the height of the Y axis we do some
>sums on the values using the (+) operator.
>
>What I need is some way to isolate the parts which break the
>polymorphism. How do I do that?
>
>Rich.
>
>
>
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners