On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:05:46PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:38:39PM +0200, Debian User wrote:
> > > > Are you interested in gettext ? I have write a bind to gettext function
> > > > + a patch to xgettext for extracting string. 
> > > 
> > > No need to write a patch (that probably won't get accepted), you just need
> > > to generate .pot file, and then run msgmarge. We got such thing for shell
> > > scripts (it's 2k of perl), so it shouldn't be hard to write it for ocaml.
> > > 
> > 
> > .... :->
> > 
> > you don't understand me : the patch is already made. I have use it
> > against the code of cameleon ( around 1000 lines of code ). It works, it
> > extract all strings etc. So it is done.
> 
> I mean it won't get accepted by gettext authors, so you force users to
> use non-standard version of standard tool, which is Bad Thing. It's far
> easier to use standalone tool that does just one thing.
> 

Hello,

Why it won't be accepted by gettext author ? As it is written in his
TODO file, he wants more langage to be accepted by xgettext. I will
offer him a ocaml support. Is it not good ?

Regard
Sylvain LE GALL

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners