Browse thread
[Caml-list] possible typechecker bug
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Commercial application written in O'Caml: ExcelEverywhere |
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:01, Mattias Waldau wrote: > Some of the readers of this list may have noticed that I use > the term "commercial" a lot. The reason is that I use Ocaml > to create commercial software. > > Disadvantage > - 8-bits strings. > UNICODE is needed and the standard for .NET, Java, Ruby... Java and Windows and Solaris all jumped the gun and use 16 bit (UCS-2/UTF-16) encoding. That encoding should not be supported in any new system, except for a codec UTF-16 <--> UCS-4 to allow UTF-16 strings to be converted for use with UCS-4 facilities (and the results converted back). > - Few libraries that can be used freely in non-open-source > commercial software Agree. Too many LGPL contributions, which I can't use in my open source project because it has a public domain licence -- I *desire* to encourage commercial use of my code: the more users the better. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners