Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] eliminating shift/reduce conflicts
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Benjamin Geer <ben@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] eliminating shift/reduce conflicts
Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla wrote:
> I however have some rules that
> need to be prefixed by either a single FOO or a foo_list

It might be easier to always parse a foo_list, even if it only contains 
one element.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: