Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] possible typechecker bug
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Remi Vanicat <vanicat@l...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Commercial application written in O'Caml: ExcelEverywhere
Richard Jones <> writes:

> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:10:49PM +1000, skaller wrote:
>> Agree. Too many LGPL contributions, which I can't
>> use in my open source project because it has a 
>> public domain licence -- I *desire* to encourage
>> commercial use of my code: the more users the better.
> Are you sure LGPL is a problem in this case? LGPL is a great
> compromise license because you get the changes to your library back,
> but commercial (and other) users can always use the library. I prefer
> it over GPL most of the time.

You need the special exception that you will find into the Objective
Caml License, because LGPL only give you the right to link with non
free only dynamically, and ocaml link statically.

Rémi Vanicat

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: