Browse thread
[Caml-list] Is there a compact syntax for masking methods in an inherit
- Ryan R Newton
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ryan R Newton <newton@M...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Is there a compact syntax for masking methods in an inherit |
Hello Camlers,
I've developed a liking for using multiple inheritacnce heavily as
follows:
When I'm working on a library (say, an evolutionary computation library,
or a distributed computing library), I'm real crazy about making
composable "plug-and-play" units of functionality rather than a
monolithic class hierarchy. That is, I like to make a base class along
with small virtual "layer" classes. I combine different features by
defining a new class which inherits from the base class and a subset of
the layer classes.
Is there a name for this sort of pattern? Is it a horrible idea for
some reason?
Anyway, the point of this post is: When inheriting the same method from
two sources, I quite reasonably get this message:
"Warning: the following methods are overriden by the inherited class:"
What's the best way to get rid of it? (Without turning off all
warnings.)
Here's an example:
class a =
object (self)
method f = 3
method g = self#f * 3
end
class virtual b =
object (self)
method g = self#f * 4
end
class c =
object
inherit a
inherit b
method h = 99
end
Warning: the following methods are overriden by the inherited class:
g
Ideally, I'd like to make the overlap explicit and get rid of the
warning at the same time by typing something like:
inherit a without g
Any ideas?
--Ryan Newton
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners