Browse thread
[Caml-list] Alternate constructors for a class
- Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Alternate constructors for a class |
I have a class defined currently like this:
class view ?width ?height ?packing ?show ?(title = "untitled") () =
(* ... *)
I want to provide an alternate way of constructing this class, in this
case by unmarshalling it from a channel (using the Marshall module).
Callers should be able to construct a view either using the explicit
parameters, or by doing:
let chan = open_in_bin "serialized_class" in
let view = new view ~chan in
(* ... *)
Now in the case above I guess I could add an extra optional ?chan
argument, but that seems a bit ugly because it doesn't prevent users
from supplying incorrectly both ~chan and ~title, for example.
Is there an easy way to provide two different constructors for a
class?
Other languages do allow different sets of arguments to different
constructors for the same class quite naturally.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://freshmeat.net/users/rwmj
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - all your business data are belong to you.
"I wish more software used text based configuration files!"
-- A Windows NT user, quoted on Slashdot.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners