Thanks for your answer, the add of explicite parenthesis allows the
compilation to work fine. It's a bit long to add parenthesis in all the
sources, but I hope the next release will fix this bug.

Vincent
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Jacques Garrigue
Date: mardi 30 septembre 2003 05:07:27
To: Vincent.Barichard@info.univ-angers.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml 3.07 and optional arguments
 
> From: "Vincent Barichard" <Vincent.Barichard@info.univ-angers.fr>
>
> > I've just downloaded ocaml 3.07 and compil it. But when I try to compil
old
> > programs, I encounter some problems with optional arguments in methods.
> [...]
> > Is there any changes with the use of optional arguments for methods ?
>
> I don't remember introducing any change at that level.
 
After another bug report, it seems that a parsing bug went into camlp4
just before the release :-(
 
Camlp4 Parsing version 3.07
 
# fun (f : ?x:int -> bool -> float) -> f true;;
This expression has type bool but is here used with type ?x:int -> bool
# fun (f : ?x:int -> bool -> float) -> f;;
- : ((?x:int -> bool) -> float) -> (?x:int -> bool) -> float = <fun>
 
This is apparently a priority problem.
A workaround is to explicitly add parentheses.
 
# fun (f : ?x:int -> (bool -> float)) -> f true;;
- : (?x:int -> bool -> float) -> float = <fun>
 
There is no fix for camlp4 itself yet.
 
Jacques Garrigue
 
.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners