Browse thread
[Caml-list] possible typechecker bug
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Benjamin Geer <ben@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Commercial application written in O'Caml: ExcelEverywhere |
skaller wrote: > In particular, I would like my product to > be ISO Standardised, IANAL, but it seems to me that the ISO standardises specifications, not implementations. Patents are an issue for specifications, because they affect all possible implementations (as in the case you mentioned), but source-code copyrights aren't, because only affect one particular implementation; anyone is free to make their own implementation of the same spec. Ben ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners