Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] possible typechecker bug
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-09-19 (14:47)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Commercial application written in O'Caml: ExcelEverywhere
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Mattias Waldau wrote:
> Disadvantage
> - 8-bits strings.
>   UNICODE is needed and the standard for .NET, Java, Ruby...

Yeah, UTF-8 is a real necessity for us too.

> - Few libraries

Yup. If there's one thing which Perl/Java have taught us, it's that
you can NEVER, EVER have a large enough standard library! It'd be
great if OCaml came with a really comprehensive library.

> - Do not drop the Win32-support

Definitely not!


Richard Jones.
Merjis Ltd. - all your business data are belong to you.
 All new technology is irrelevant until it is taken up by the public.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: