Browse thread
[Caml-list] possible typechecker bug
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Julien Signoles <Julien.Signoles@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] possible typechecker bug |
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Fernando Alegre wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:00:35AM +0400, malc wrote:
>
> > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200211/msg00058.html
>
> Yes. This seems to be another instance of possibly the same bug. The
> workaround suggested in your case was to add "and" between the types...
>
> However, in our case, there is only one type, so I cannot add an "and"...
> Can anyone suggest another workaround?
Inspired from the above message, you can rewrite the module BFloat as
follow :
module Bfloat = struct
type t = Afloat.t (* introduce a new manifest type... *)
and x = {f:t} (* ... so you can use "and" *)
end
Julien.
--
mailto:Julien.Signoles@lri.fr ; http://www.lri.fr/~signoles
"In theory, practice and theory are the same,
but in practice they are different" (Larry McVoy)
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners