Browse thread
[Caml-list] interface of sorted collections
-
Christian Lindig
-
Florian Hars
- Damien Doligez
-
Florian Hars
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] interface of sorted collections |
On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 09:23 AM, Florian Hars wrote: > Christian Lindig wrote: >> I have noted that in sorted collections like the Map and Set modules > > They are unsorted collections. If you observe some kind of sorting in > these collections, it is just an implementation accident. Not quite. Both Set and Map demand ordered types as arguments, and that's no accident. -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners