Browse thread
[Caml-list] Possible to use optional args in external (C) calls?
-
Richard Jones
- Eric C. Cooper
- Robert Roessler
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Robert Roessler <robert@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Possible to use optional args in external (C) calls? |
Richard Jones wrote: > Is it possible to use optional or any labelled args in calls to C > code? I assume that optional args are passed as 'argtype option', but > what order do they appear to the C? In order, yes, and as Eric says, in the "external" declaration order. For example, the "OCaml-Win32" package from the "humps" makes use of both optional and labeled args. The former show up as either "Val_int(0)" or a value of the type expected, while the latter are used in the specifications of C callbacks. -- Robert Roessler robert@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners