Browse thread
[Caml-list] Profiling a function execution
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-11-25 (22:36) |
From: | Kim Nguyen <nguyen@b...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Profiling a function execution |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:05:53 +0100 Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr> wrote: Hello, > Some clever hacks involving external C functions were given on this list. > I'm not sure I would endorse them :-) Is this for a "political" reason (this 'side effect' of the compiler should not be exposed to the casual user or can this hack lead to an unsafety of some kind ? (in code generation or something else ?) > We're working hard on removing the last discrepancies > between the two compilers... Does this include a Dynlink module for native code ? ( or is such a module incompatible with the design of the compiler or with type safety ? ) Regards, Kim Nguyen.