English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Profiling a function execution
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-11-25 (22:36)
From: Kim Nguyen <nguyen@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Profiling a function execution
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:05:53 +0100
Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr> wrote:


> Some clever hacks involving external C functions were given on this list.
> I'm not sure I would endorse them :-)

Is this for a "political" reason (this 'side effect' of the compiler should not be
exposed to the casual user or can this hack lead to an unsafety of some kind ?
(in code generation or something else ?)

> We're working hard on removing the last discrepancies
> between the two compilers...

Does this include a Dynlink module for native code ? ( or is such a module
incompatible with the design of the compiler or with type safety ? )


Kim Nguyen.