Browse thread
[Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat ()
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
| Subject: | Self-detection of native code execution (Was Re: [Caml-list] Accuracy of Gc.stat ()) |
Le 22 nov. 03, à 12:49, Richard Jones a écrit :
>> Neat trick. This _ought_ to work, but it doesn't for some reason:
>>
>> let arg = (true, false)
>> external is_bytecode : bool * bool -> bool = "%field0" "%field1"
>>
>> let () =
>> if is_bytecode arg then
>> print_endline "Bytecode!"
>> else
>> print_endline "Native!"
>>
>> Perhaps someone can explain why ...
Nice try, too bad it doesn't work. I would even prefer that one :
let arg = true
external is_bytecode : bool -> bool = "%identity" "%boolnot"
let () =
if is_bytecode arg then
print_endline "Bytecode!"
else
print_endline "Native!"
> OK, closer inspection of the manual[*] reveals why this doesn't work.
> Surely OCaml should flag the above code as a bug, because there are
> fewer than the magical 6 arguments?
The strange thing is that the function given by Kim also have fewer
than 6 arguments.
Daniel
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners