Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:14, Oleg Trott wrote:
> On Thursday 30 October 2003 03:05 pm, Issac Trotts wrote:

> Or, better yet, use Big_int:

Felix does that, and i'm very happy with the idea.
Constant folding is done in "infinite" precision.
The check for size, if done, would occur in the backend
code generator .. not the parser.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: