Browse thread
[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2003-11-02 (16:08) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals |
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:14, Oleg Trott wrote: > On Thursday 30 October 2003 03:05 pm, Issac Trotts wrote: > > Or, better yet, use Big_int: Felix does that, and i'm very happy with the idea. Constant folding is done in "infinite" precision. The check for size, if done, would occur in the backend code generator .. not the parser. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners