Browse thread
[Caml-list] Executable size?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-11-13 (22:16) |
From: | John J Lee <jjl@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Executable size? |
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Eric Dahlman wrote: [...] > So I would say that it is totally possible to "enhance" a language like > ocaml to generate tiny hello world executables, but I would much rather > have the bright people working on O'Caml write something of more value. Sure, that makes sense. > I know that my definition of value is probably at odds with yours in > this case. ;-) Well, maybe not: 45k is very far from huge even for a puny modem, after all, and a worthwhile factor of ten improvement over the smallest Python "hello world" I've seen. (though that 45k doesn't include decompression for initial unzipping, so the comparison I make there isn't quite correct) Thanks for everybody's responses. John ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners