Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <Christophe.Raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Rounding mode + extended |
At this address, you will find a very small library for changing the rounding mode from OCaml (works on 6 processors, but only tested on i486) ftp://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/pub/users/RAFFALLI/OCaml-round.tgz ... Is it possible to use "extended" instead of "double" in OCaml for float (I am ready to recompile OCaml for this) What was the reason to have only one type of "float" ? Three types of float (float, double and extended) do not explode the complexity of the optimization for float array or float in record (I think). Ok, you should have three additions +. +.. and +... :-( Is this the only reason ? -- Christophe Raffalli Université de Savoie Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03 fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42 mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI --------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution can check this signature --------------------------------------------- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners