Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Eray Ozkural <exa@k...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation?
On Thursday 06 November 2003 18:41, Harrison, John R wrote:
> Does anyone know a representation of finite sets over an orderable
> polymorphic type that's (1) efficient and (2) canonical? Even better would
> be a CAML or OCaml implementation. More precisely I'm looking for:
>   1. Log-time lookup and insertion, and linear-time union, intersection
> etc.
>   2. Equal sets are represented by the same object.
> For example, ordered lists satisfy (2) but only part of (1), while all the
> variants of balanced trees I can remember that satisfy (1) --- AVL trees
> etc. --- fail (2).

It will be pretty hard to get 2. Not unless you are using disjoint sets :) You 
basically want O(1) for set equality, I suppose. Now, I think you wish to 
insert a new set in amortized O(lgn) time like in a disjoint set 

You can still use edison, isn't it good enough for you?

I'm saying this, because I don't think there is a straightforward functional  
way. I have on my mind 2-universal hash functions, but here I am facing bugs 
of my own. I'm not in the structure monster mode right now it seems :) 


Eray Ozkural (exa) <>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara  KDE Project:
www:  Malfunction:
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: