Browse thread
[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
-
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Alex Baretta
-
Issac Trotts
-
Oleg Trott
-
skaller
-
Brian Hurt
- Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- skaller
-
Brian Hurt
- Kenneth Knowles
-
skaller
- Frederic van der Plancke
-
Oleg Trott
- Xavier Leroy
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@k...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals |
W li¶cie z nie, 02-11-2003, godz. 17:23, Brian Hurt pisze:
> This is a bad idea. I'd like the constant folding to be done in the word
> length that the code will be executed in- this way, there is no difference
> between code that is executed at run time and code that is executed at
> compile time.
Constant folding is different from interpreting literals.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners