Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Executable size?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Executable size?

On Nov 12, 2003, at 9:33, Richard Jones wrote:

> Of course you can always use OCaml as a scripting language (ie.  tiny
> "executables" preceeded by #!/usr/bin/ocaml), or distribute the
> bytecode, which tends to be small, so you have more choices than the
> languages you've listed above.

	I haven't seen the bytecode be much smaller than native executables:

-rwx--x--x  1 dustin  staff   320900 12 Nov 10:06 parseTimingLog*
-rwx------  1 dustin  staff   306614 12 Nov 09:59 parseTimingLogbc*


-- 
Dustin Sallings

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners