Browse thread
[Caml-list] Executable size?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-11-12 (18:07) |
From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Executable size? |
On Nov 12, 2003, at 9:33, Richard Jones wrote: > Of course you can always use OCaml as a scripting language (ie. tiny > "executables" preceeded by #!/usr/bin/ocaml), or distribute the > bytecode, which tends to be small, so you have more choices than the > languages you've listed above. I haven't seen the bytecode be much smaller than native executables: -rwx--x--x 1 dustin staff 320900 12 Nov 10:06 parseTimingLog* -rwx------ 1 dustin staff 306614 12 Nov 09:59 parseTimingLogbc* -- Dustin Sallings ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners