On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Martin Jambon wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote:
> 
> > My aims is to make something more Makefile like ( ie you will have the
> > ability to add rules ). Off course, my first goal is to compile ml file.
> > So there will be less features than Makefile.
> 
> Are you sure? If this compiles only Caml code, nobody will use it for 
> serious projects. But I was thinking of loadable modules like in emacs 
> instead of a rigid and limited set of predefined rules.
> If we think of make as a preprocessor for shell-scripts, then we can 
> create a preprocessor for OCaml that will do the same but will benefit 
> from many built-in properties that sh doesn't have and that (GNU) make 
> hardly provides.
> 

Hello,

I was thinking of dynlink for loadable module...

But i need to investigate on other tools ( omake ).

Regard
Sylvain LE GALL

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners