Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Harrison, John R <johnh@i...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Efficient and canonical set representation?
| It is not a coincidence. I remember having read somewhere that it
| could be proven that if a balanced tree (based on comparisons) did not
| have enough different representations of a same set, then the
| insertion could not be done in logarithmic time.

Interesting. I was beginning to suspect that might be the case. Does
anyone have an exact reference for such a result?


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: