Browse thread
[Caml-list] Strange physical equality behavior
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Brown <caml-list@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Strange physical equality behavior |
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:48:22AM -0500, Oleg Trott wrote: > On Sunday 09 November 2003 08:33 pm, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > On mutable structures, [e1 == e2] is true if and only if > > physical modification of [e1] also affects [e2]. > > By the way, either "mutable structures" or "physical modification" need to be > clarified, because if (int ref list) is "mutable" then the above is wrong: If you take structure to mean a single data type, rather than a more complicated data structure, then it is true. Dave ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners