Browse thread
[Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck
-
Nuutti Kotivuori
-
Nicolas Cannasse
-
Benjamin Geer
- Nicolas Cannasse
- Nuutti Kotivuori
-
Benjamin Geer
- Jacques Garrigue
- Brian Hurt
-
Nicolas Cannasse
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-12-07 (14:12) |
From: | Nicolas Cannasse <warplayer@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck |
> Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > > For most of the cases, modules should be powerful enough and offer far > > better performances... and inlining. > > Even if you need some specialisation, you can always handle it using a > > closure. > > Could you give an example? > > Ben > For example, you have a module A with a type t which have one or more mutable fields where you can store user given closures that will perform some specific tasks. Theses closures can be seen has type "methods" , and if the type is visible, you can even do some runtime subclassing. Nicolas Cannasse ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners