Browse thread
[Caml-list] Frustrated Beginner
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Frustrated Beginner |
On Dec 23, 2003, at 4:16, Richard Jones wrote: > I like to think of the 'string option' type as being a bit like > two concepts in more familiar languages: > > (1) NULL pointers in C, or > (2) Scalars in Perl, which can be 'undef'. I think of it more like SQL. Any given variable may be defined to be nullable or not, but a variable that is not nullable an never be null. The main difference is that the compiler enforces that you check for null on nullable fields. -- SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners