Brian Hurt wrote:
> - Despite my best efforts, ocaml inlined (and removed) the call to
> foo.  In general this is good, but it did defeat my efforts to time
> how long a direct function call took.  For some reason it didn't
> also eliminate the for loops.  If I had to guess, Ocaml's call to a
> known function is about the same speed as C's.

I am not certain what it does, but did you try 'ocamlopt -inline -1 ...'?

For me, that seemed to prevent some inlining atleast.

-- Naked

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners