Browse thread
[Caml-list] stream conversion
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-12-09 (19:43) |
From: | Tim Freeman <tim@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] stream conversion |
From: brogoff@speakeasy.net >The documentation in the Stream library for the stream builders (you use >Stream.of_string) states : > > Warning: these functions create streams with fast access; it is illegal to > mix them with streams built with [< >]; would raise Failure when > accessing such mixed streams. > >and you build such streams by stream concatenation with your convert function >and when you make foo. There's a fix for this bug at http://www.fungible.com/stream_fixed.ml and http://www.fungible.com/stream_fixed.mli. It's bug 1284 in the OCAML bug-tracking system. According to the benchmark given in the comments at the end of http://www.fungible.com/stream_fixed.ml, my version is essentially the same speed as the original. Unlike the original version, it does not do type-unsafe efficiency hacks. The bug database at http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs documents that bug 1284 has been ignored without comment as of 9 Dec 2003. My code is a clean solution to a problem that has been reported repeatedly, so I find that frustrating. This looks to me like a clear signal that I shouldn't bother sending them any other bugfixes. -- Tim Freeman tim@fungible.com I xeroxed a mirror. Now I have an extra xerox machine. -- Steven Wright ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners