Browse thread
[Caml-list] Recursive class types (long-standing question ...)
- William Chesters
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | William Chesters <williamc@p...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Recursive class types (long-standing question ...) |
Here's something I've wondered about for a while and just encountered again.
How come this class ..
class virtual ['a] c = object
method virtual b: bool c
end
... gets a constraint 'a = bool? I.e. for instance this doesn't compile:
class virtual ['a] c = object
method virtual b: bool c
method virtual i: int c
(* "This type int should be an instance of type bool" *)
end
Note that the following does work in C++:
template <class a>
struct c {
virtual c<bool> b() = 0;
virtual c<int> i() = 0;
};
I guess there are workarounds but it seems unnecessary that ML should find
recursive parameterised classes harder than C++?
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners