Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Frustrated Beginner
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Eric Merritt <cyberlync@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml syntax.
> 	Actually, for me, it's that I've been spending time
> learning the base 
> ocaml stuff and I get this strange feeling that
> camlp4 is an 
> unnecessary extra chunk of language I'd need to
> learn.  From what I've 
> been reading, it seems like I should probably get
> over that.  It's 
> certainly not because I favor inconsistencies.

 So far I have stayed away from the camlp4 revised
syntax, its just not as appealing to me. I tend to
think of the standard ocaml syntax as somewhat clean
and the p4 modifications as somewhat kludgey. Thats
just my opinion however.
> 	Like with most things, I'll probably eventually
> start playing with it 
> and wonder why I was so stupid to deny myself this
> great enhancement.
 I havn't seen any compelling reason to switch. As
long as the core ocaml language isn't going to migrate
to it I don't see the point.

Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: