[...]
> So - I am asking if I'm correct in my deductions here, or if I missed
> some important point. Or if there's an alternative way to circumvent
> this restriction.
>
> To summarize - is there any way to have some function (or method or
> whatever) that is able to access object member data, without the
> overhead of a lazy binding function call? Preferably ofcourse such a
> function should be eligible to be inlined.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -- Naked

There is good way : don't use objects :-)
For most of the cases, modules should be powerful enough and offer far
better performances... and inlining.
Even if you need some specialisation, you can always handle it using a
closure.

Nicolas Cannasse

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners