Browse thread
[Caml-list] Python's yield, Lisp's call-cc or C's setjmp/longjmp in OCaml
-
Nuutti Kotivuori
- Oleg Trott
- Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Brian Hurt
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2003-12-16 (17:40) |
From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Python's yield, Lisp's call-cc or C's setjmp/longjmp in OCaml |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > I am wondering, does OCaml provide any variant of being able to > bypass the normal function call and return discipline? > > More or less generic implementations of this can be seen in for > example Python's yield instruction, Lisp's call-cc or call with > current continuation, or C's setjmp/longjmp. By my measurements, Ocaml's exceptions are faster than C's setjmp/longjmp. Ocaml doesn't provide first-class continuations, but most of the things people actually do with call-cc can be done in other ways in Ocaml. I don't know what Python's yield instruction does. > > And if not, what are the chances of something like that seeing the > light of day in the future? Are there any fundamental problems in > OCaml that would make the implementation of such a thing exceedingly > difficult? What do you want to do? -- "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." - Gene Spafford Brian ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners