Browse thread
[Caml-list] getting stack traces in running code
-
Yaron M. Minsky
- Richard Jones
-
Issac Trotts
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Damien Doligez
- Issac Trotts
-
Nicolas Cannasse
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2003-12-03 (14:19) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] getting stack traces in running code |
On Wednesday, December 3, 2003, at 04:19 AM, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > BTW, if the "print_exception_backtrace" of the caml sources was > exported as > Primitive, we would be able to do it without the need of any C stub : > the > other way to do it is then to run a modified interpreter where > CAMLexport > have been replaced with CAMLprim in backtrace.c.... Don't do that. print_exception_backtrace returns void, but a CAMLprim must return a value. You'll have to make it return Val_unit. -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners