Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven Luther <sven.luther@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1 |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:23:04AM +1100, skaller wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:35, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:18:33PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > > > Notice that many licences mandate that either the full licence or a > > reduced version is available together with the source you distribute. > > I think that is easily solved as Maxence suggested. > > The problem is that some licences require that the > licence or a reduced version of it *also* occur > in every source file, and not just as a separate > document in the distribution. Well, but at least the licence should be put in every source tarball or something, and i believe it is good that each individual file also comes with a single line telling the licence that is used and where to find it. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners