Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml killer
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-01-29 (08:52) |
From: | Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@P...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Chet Murthy wrote: > These are the things that matter in a language. The fact that CAML > has fancy types, well, -I- like it, but it isn't why I wrote some of > my most complex systems in it, and it will never be enough to push > CAML into the mainstream. At least, it is nice to be able to use the FFI to define a function believe_me: 'a -> 'b which is just the identity, so that one can pass as an argument a function to itself. There _are_ some situations where things are best handled by using the fixed-point principle at a deep level. Yes, you may call me a heretic. No, I do not repair fridges with chainsaws. -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners