Browse thread
[Caml-list] Reason why 'for' doesn't work across floats?
-
Richard Jones
-
Michal Moskal
-
Richard Jones
- Artem Prisyznuk
- Florian Hars
- Jacques Carette
-
Richard Jones
-
Michal Moskal
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2004-01-08 (16:15) |
| From: | Artem Prisyznuk <tema@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Reason why 'for' doesn't work across floats? |
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:47:59 +0000, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote: >> One would need "for.", which doesn't seem appealing. > > Perhaps 'a -> 'a -> 'a ? > > Is this much different from the generic-but-not-really < operator in > OCaml? Operator '<' - defined on any types, it's really polymorph operator. But operator 'for' not has sences on string type. -- Artem Prysyznuk tema@sit.kiev.ua ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners