Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml killer
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-01-28 (23:48) |
From: | Martin Berger <martinb@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer |
> Java/the JVM is not a systems-programming language. Period. Oh, and > I'll defend that against all comers. Difference is, though, if you > wanna attack, I'll expect real examples, not the academic crap that > most programming language theorists throw around. i'll have to defend my profession here: which working programming language theorist proposes java as a "systems-programming language"? most of them are busy researching concurrency or pointer arithmetic these days. but i guess it depends what you mean by that "systems-programming language". rather than attempting a definition (it's late here), i'll point to C/C++ or Cyclone as examples. martin ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners