Browse thread
[Caml-list] CamlDL/Abstract pointers problem
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] CamlDL/Abstract pointers problem |
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> However, there is another scenario which could cause you problems:
> if for some reason your C pointer get freed, and later the ML heap is
> extended so that it includes the address of the pointer, then you may
> have some pointers left on the ML which will now be seen as ML
> pointers.
ML doesn't memset memory it just allocated? This may be a problem- I
don't *think* the C standard requires malloc to memset the memory itself,
which means you might be getting garbage memory.
--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
- Gene Spafford
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners