Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-01-21 (13:59) |
From: | skaller <skaller@t...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1 |
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 21:12, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:37:30 +0200 > > I guess licensing is for people to worry about, not programs :) > > But providing an easy way to indicate the license is important, I think, > -> the @license tag I want to add. Some licences .. most licences unfortunately .. create problems for such fine granularity. Technically to 'element-get' a single element which is a 3 line function .. you'd have to include the whole licence blurb of 60 lines or whatever. In interscript (my literate progamming/packaging system), I created some mechanism in which a single copy of each required licence could be shipped with a package.. but the licences were never included in the actual sources. [The typeset output contained a link to the file for html, or a reference for latex, etc ..). Anyhow, when you 'element-get' an element, you probably have to ensure the element is (a) at least tagged in the fragment source with the licence name (b) a copy of the required notice is fetched as well .. even if the whole notice isn't included with each element. -- John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@tpg.com.au snail:25/85c Wigram Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850. Checkout Felix: http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners