Browse thread
[Caml-list] ocaml killer
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chet Murthy <chet@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer |
>>>>> "CM" == Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com> writes:
CM> All of these things, in my opinion, benefit from being written
CM> in high-level languages -- significantly higher than CCured
CM> and Cyclone.
CM> The high-level abstraction capabilities of CAML shine here,
CM> and do some of capabilities of Java in these applications.
I wasn't clear here. The high-level capabilities of both Java and
CAML are useful in writing such systems. Too bad Java/the JVM's
behavioural attributes make it totally unsuited. Ah, well.
For those who don't understand what I mean, take a look at
InstallShield MultiPlatform. Also look at "javac" itself. And "jar".
Ask yourself how such simple problems have admitted such awful
solutions in Java. Marvel at the foolishness of the creators of these
artifacts.
--chet--
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners