Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@t...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:

> Well, but at least the licence should be put in every source tarball or
> something, and i believe it is good that each individual file also comes
> with a single line telling the licence that is used and where to find
> it.

I agree but (a) some licences seem to ask for more,
and (b) exactly what is a 'file'?

I mean, the tarball is a file..
If you download Felix, you get a set of literate programmed
files that each generate multiple Ocaml files ..

How would I merge all those elements into a single
'util.ml' file? With a licence tag for each element still?
Author? Reference to orginal source? Or is it enough
to collate all of that and put it all in one
place at the top of the file 'util.ml'. Or if I make
20 or so files from more significant elements ..
just the whole distribution LICENCE says:

"all the code here is licenced BSD MIT GPL 
simultaneously .. "

LOL! GPL isn't merely a virus .. it appears to have mutated 
into many different genotypes now .. :-))

-- 
John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@tpg.com.au
snail:25/85c Wigram Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.
voice:61-2-9660-0850. Checkout Felix: http://felix.sf.net




-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners