> But at this moment there is no way of packaging only .mli modules,
> since they do not produce object files. The type signatures of such
> .ml-less-modules are kept from packaing, and I faced to name
> collisions.

You're correct, and what you suggest is on my "to do" list.

> Is there any work-around for this, except creating corresponding .ml
> files for them ?

That's currently the only workaround, as far as I know.

- Xavier Leroy

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners