On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 04:34:47AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 02:34, David Brown wrote:
> > What does this function do?  You could argue for any result a, (a+1),
> > (a+2), or (a+3).  The casual definition of the where clause doesn't
> > specify precedence.  Obviously, an implementation would have to chose
> > one, but there is no clear reason one choice is better than the other.
> 
> I guess some syntactic constructs are fairly subjective. I wonder what the 
> designers thought of a where clause.
> 

Could it be done as a syntax extension via camlp4?

-- 
Shawn Wagner
shawnw@speakeasy.org

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners