Browse thread
[Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-01-21 (15:22) |
From: | skaller <skaller@t...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Caml-get 0.1 |
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:35, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:18:33PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > Notice that many licences mandate that either the full licence or a > reduced version is available together with the source you distribute. I think that is easily solved as Maxence suggested. The problem is that some licences require that the licence or a reduced version of it *also* occur in every source file, and not just as a separate document in the distribution. I don't think the tool should try to solve that. I think that if this is the case the vendor simply can't put the elements into a repository without actually placing the whole licence in front of each fragment. -- John Max Skaller, mailto:skaller@tpg.com.au snail:25/85c Wigram Rd, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. voice:61-2-9660-0850. Checkout Felix: http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners