Browse thread
[Caml-list] Stupid question
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt@s...> |
| Subject: | [Caml-list] Stupid question |
I was poking around in the produced assembly code of some ocaml code of
mine, and I noticed something. The construct:
if (x < m) <> (y < m) then
...
when the compiler knows that x, y, and m are all ints, it calls an
external C routine to compare the two booleans. But the construct:
if (x < m) != (y < m) then
...
does not. Now, this isn't a big deal- I just replaced <> with != and no
problem. But I was kind of interested in why the compiler didn't catch
and optimize this. Is there some sort of subtle semantic difference I'm
too dense to see?
--
"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of
mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
- Gene Spafford
Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners