Browse thread
[Caml-list] References to polymorphic variants
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-02-26 (01:49) |
From: | Eric C. Cooper <ecc@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] References to polymorphic variants |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:07:19PM -0800, Issac Trotts wrote: > He's talking about compiling it, which is slightly different: > > $ cat foo.ml > let (x : ([> ] option) ref ) = ref None ;; > > $ /usr/bin/ocamlc -c foo.ml > File "foo.ml", line 1, characters 31-39: > The type of this expression, _[> ] option ref, > contains type variables that cannot be generalized > > The set of values that x can have is still unspecified, so there is > implicitly a type variable whose value needs to be nailed down before > the example can compile. Here's a way to work around it: > > type t = [ `bleh | `woof ];; > let x = ref (None : t option);; Or, he can just use x in the scope of that module, if that's sufficient for his application. $ cat foo.ml let (x : [> ] option ref) = ref None let () = x := Some `Apple; x := Some (`Pair (17, "foo")); x := Some `Cheese $ ocamlc -i -c foo.ml val x : _[> `Apple | `Cheese | `Pair of int * string ] option ref -- Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners